Seminari a l’entorn dels valors del patrimoni i l’interacció amb el públic en l’arqueologia [Seminar on heritage values and public interaction in archaeology]
Within the framework of a
workshop for the “Heritage Values” project, the GAPP (Heritage and PublicArchaeology Group) at University of Barcelona organized an intense seminar
about public interaction in archaeology. Intense, because we had the
opportunity to share and debate projects and ideas with nearly 20 colleagues in
one day, which started for me at 5 am to take the train from Madrid to
Barcelona.
The seminar consisted of
three parts: sustainability and participation in heritage policy; cultural
tourism and new technologies; and the role of public archaeology as a
participation tool. The outcomes of the seminar will be published soon, so I
will not make a traditional review of the different papers presented, but
rather a general comment on the topics debated and will share some thoughts about
them.
Image: Seminar poster and programme (source: Universitat de Barcelona)
How do we interact with
the public as professionals? How does the public interact with archaeological
heritage? Three actors, two questions. Passive and active approaches to the
same issues. The challenge, to make people interact with and value heritage,
and to make professionals get involved to achieve this goal. It sounds like we
are forcing everyone to do something they don’t want to but in fact, attending
to the results of some of the projects, people want to interact with heritage
and that is something to take into account. Further research in public
attitudes towards heritage is needed in order to understand how this works (and
how it can work better).
How can new (and old)
technologies help us improve the tourism experience from heritage resources?
That could possibly be a leading question for a debate, understood the “old
way”. However, this part was more about the challenges of using new
technologies, the use of technology per se without a clear goal, the lack of
interaction with professionals in tourism, the difficulties in expanding
networks, and so on. Real issues that defy everyday management of
archaeological heritage in the context of outreach and tourism.
Image: Jaime giving his presentation (source: Gemma Cardona)
The third part is for me the
most difficult to comment on, as I was one of the speakers. While the concept
of public archaeology is perverted by disoriented actions, these actions are
public archaeology anyway. We cannot call for action and then repudiate the
results. Building bridges for cooperation and improving the way things are done
is essential, and many projects are showing a path. However, the path is not
straight and each project needs its own solutions. We need to stand as a
collective to get the job done.
Sometimes public
archaeology is not even mentioned, but the spirit is there. As I have said
somewhere before, I don’t care if you call it different names, as long as you do
it.
Jaime Almansa Sánchez
Comments